विकल्प का आधार

हज़ारों-लाखों वर्षों से अभी तक मानव द्वारा किये हुए कर्म को आंकलित करते हुए इसके विकल्प को खोजा गया है।

हज़ारों-लाखों  वर्षों से अब तक मानव ने जो कार्य किया उसके फल-परिणाम में धरती का बीमार होना मुझे समझ में आया।  हज़ारों-लाखों  वर्षों से मानव ने जो कार्य किया, उसका आंकलन है - मानव ने जीव-चेतना वश सारे अपराधों को किया या अपराधों के साथ सहमत रहा।  अपराधों के साथ सहमत रहने का उदाहरण है - अभी का हमारा संविधान।  इस संविधान के साथ सभी सहमत हैं, जो मूलतः कहता है - "गलती को गलती से रोको, युद्ध को युद्ध से रोको, अपराध को अपराध से रोको".  इन तीनो बातों के मूल में यह अपेक्षा (मान्यता) है - युद्ध से युद्ध रुकता है, अपराध से अपराध रुकता है, गलती से गलती रुकती है।  इसके बाद पूछा तो क्या ऐसे युद्ध रुकता है? अपराध रुकता है?  गलती रुकती है?  तो उत्तर मिला - नहीं।  हर देश की सीमाओं पर तैनात सेनायें या तो युद्द करेंगी या युद्ध के लिए तैयारी करेंगी।  इससे युद्ध रुका कहाँ?  दूसरे - न्याय पालिका ने अपराध से अपराध को रोकने को विधि माना है।  इसका मतलब है, एक आदमी को अपराध करने से रोकने के लिए दस व्यक्ति अपराध करना सीखें, तभी वे अपराध को रोक पायेंगे।  इस विधि से अपराध बढेगा या घटेगा?  इसी तरह गलती को गलती से रोकने से गलतियाँ बढ़ी हैं।  मानव के इन सारे कार्यों का फल-परिणाम धरती पर ही गुजरा , क्योंकि धरती पर ही तो मानव है।  

- श्री ए. नागराज के साथ संवाद पर आधारित (अगस्त 2006, अमरकंटक)

Units of Nature in Space

Question: - Your entire postulation is based on existence.  You have said that entire existence is in the form of “Nature in Omnipotence”.  You claim that the Omnipotence is present at the places where units are not there, and it is also present at the places that are tightly packed with units.  Please explain this.

Answer: - Omnipotence can be understood easily.  It is the Space – which has been given many names.  What is the reality of Space?  All units are capable of being inspired from Space.  How does this inspiration happen?  Does Space push units into action?  The prevalent science claims that all activities of nature started from the push of the Big Bang.  There is nothing in Space that could push.  It has no pulse, no motion and no pressure.  So there is no question of its pushing anything into action.  Every unit is energized and inspired in the Space – as evidence.  Space is present at all places.  Every unit is submerged and encircled in this pervasiveness.  The distinction in units means the presence of Space between them.  If the Space were not there, the units could not be separated from one another.  Also the units join with each other, because there is Space between them.  In this way, Space is the basis of composition (joining of units) and decomposition (separation of units).  Units are continuously active because of their being energized in Space.
First there are objects seen in the form of units.  They occupy Space to the extent of their area.  The areas could be different for different objects.  It is not possible to tell the area of Space, because it has no limits.

According to materialism, Space is not present where units are present – which implies, units displace Space. Therefore units are believed (in materialism) to be mightier (heavier) than Space.  While in reality, all units are in the state of zero attraction.  Earth, Sun, Solar System, galaxies – they all are in the state of zero attraction.  The state of zero attraction means that units and Space do not express weight (heaviness) towards each other in their mutuality - while the expression of weight (heaviness) is clearly there in the mutuality of units.  For example, two atoms express weight towards one another in their mutuality, because of their tendency to form a molecule.  In the same way, molecules express weight towards one another because of their tendency to make a composition.  The gravitation force among units to express weight in their mutuality is for the purpose of participating in evolution or for participating in holistic orderliness of nature.  A stone when dropped from a small distance within Earth’s environment falls back to Earth itself.  It happens on the basis of the innate tendency (orientation) of evolution in that stone.  At the time when this tendency gets expressed, we call it gravitation.  With these examples we understand that all units are continuously active.  The evidence of permeability of Space is continuous activity, restraint and forcefulness in every unit.  Irrespective of where a unit is located in existence, its restraint, continuous activity and forcefulness remains as it was – this is also an evidence of permeability of Space.

Question: - You have postulated that infinite units of nature are immersed, encircled and soaked in the Omnipotence, and these get reflected on one another from infinite angles.  Please explain this.

Answer: - The formula here is – every unit (object) is with infinite angles in itself.  Each of the infinite angles from an object gets extended in one direction or the other in a straight line, and on that line that object remains reflected.  Every such angle ends up into some object or the other somewhere.  Therefore, the place where the angle meets another object has the reflection of first object over it.  This mutual reflection and recognition evidences the fact that the objects are lighted.  Light is innate to objects and its evidence is objects are lighted.  In this way, infinite angles with every unit are for the purpose of its being lighted.  I understand that you are lighted because of your reflection on me.

- An excerpt from English translation of "Jeevan Vidya - Ek Parichaya" by Shree A. Nagraj.

Evolution Principle

Question: - Darwin postulated evolution principle (of Natural Selection) which has a widespread acceptance even today.  What is the distinction between your postulation of evolution from that of Darwin?

Answer: - Darwin’s postulation talks of evolution based on structural composition of body.  For example: - body composition of an insect, a leech, a horse, a cow – and in the same way human body composition.  The body compositions were studied based on the skeletal structures.  Evolution was explained in terms of how the bones became longer or shorter, wider or narrower in bodies of animals.    Here human body was considered as reference and all other body compositions were chronologically linked behind it as course of evolution.  Darwin’s postulation about body composition has some difficulty, but his presentation about human being is completely wrong.  According to Darwin, monkeys successively transformed into humans and many intermediate life forms happened in this course of evolution, which eventually perished.  While according to me, the evolution of human body happened as a result of exploration in the pranic cells in the womb of some or the other enriched brain animal with the purpose of establishing the tradition of a body composition through which jeevan could evidence its awakening.  According to Darwin, the circumstances of environment and habitat forced these events of uncertain body compositions.  Darwin did not have the understanding of jeevan (conscious unit).  He has not given any postulations from the reference of jeevan.  Human being is a combined form of jeevan and body.  Thus far evolution has been searched in body, in skeletons, and there are Nobel prizes, degrees and jobs based on these.  The reference of those evolution theories is human body.  If these theories are correct then humanness should have got realized along with human body's evolution , but that has not happened.  Human being cannot be explained in terms of body alone, in terms of skeletal frame.  As its evidence, Darwin himself has written that – I myself don’t get described in the framework of my bone structure.  Darwin was incapable of giving definition of human being.  He called evolution to be improvement in composition, while in reality the reference of evolutionary progress is jeevan.  Body cannot function in the absence of jeevan.  The one which keeps the body alive is jeevan itself.  Human being is neither just on the basis of jeevan nor just on the basis of body.  Human being is on the basis of both jeevan and body.

The evolution in atom is in terms of constitutional completeness.  Every atom has a constitution with more than one particle.  Every atom has to have a nucleus and orbiting particles.  Such atoms are naturally there in existence, having two or more particles constituting them.  There are many kinds of atoms, and among these is jeevan atom.  There is no increase or decrease in the number of particles constituting a jeevan atom, therefore it is with inexhaustible force and strength.  This itself is evolution in atom.  Jeevan atom is being called as ‘evolved’, and awakening happens after this evolution.  The evidence of awakening is – knowing, believing, recognizing and fulfilling.  An atomic particle recognizes other atomic particle, and that is how these become orderly together by being in definite distance from each other – which becomes evident in the form of physical and chemical activities of nature.  The most evolved composition of chemical activities is evident in the form of human body.

- An excerpt from English translation of "Jeevan Vidya - Ek Parichaya" by Shree A. Nagraj.

Prevalent tradition and Common man

Question: - What is your view about the common man caught up in the prevalent traditions?

Answer: - You have used two words – 1. Prevalent tradition, 2. Common man.  I understand prevalent tradition to be under four heads.  1. Seat of Education, 2. Seat of Religion, 3. Seat of State, and 4. Seat of Business.  These are the four cornerstones of prevalent tradition.  Every individual goes through these systems sooner or later.  In my view, all these dimensions of prevalent tradition have become thoroughly destroyed.  They have nothing to offer to their followers.  What they claim is another matter though.  They claim to provide paths of human salvation.  However, we could never see anyone who has achieved salvation through these systems.  On the contrary, those who promise salvation are seen to be drowning in the same waters.  It is on this basis that I say that all prevalent traditions have become rotten and useless.  If there is any source of meaningfulness left then that is common man.  I have studied that every human being has more than 51% of meaningfulness.  Human being can be reformed.  Prevalent traditions cannot be reformed - these will need to be replaced with a new tradition.  There is no substance in prevalent traditions which could be reformed.


Human race until now has kept thinking - “I am wrong, tradition is right".  Here I want to open the eyes of human being and not the eyes of tradition.  I have nothing to do with the prevalent traditions.  I am a human being and I am concerned with human beings.

Question: On one hand you say that traditions are rotten, on the other hand you say that common man who is product of same traditions has more than 51% of meaningfulness.  What do you mean by being meaningful?

Answer: The four seats of tradition that I mentioned, those who are sitting there have no inquiry (need of understanding) for getting reformed.  Those who are occupying these seats and the documented frameworks of these seats don’t have any basis for inquiring for truth.  On this basis I say that prevalent traditions have become rotten.  While every human being has inquiry of knowing truth to some extent or other, on this basis I claim that human being has more than 51% of meaningfulness.

- Excerpt from English Translation of "Jeevan Vidya - Ek Parichaya" by Shree A. Nagraj.

Universalizing Madhyasth Darshan

"Until something is understood it is called as research or exploration.  You already know how any accomplishment from a research or exploration gets universalized through education.  Universalizing this accomplishment (of Madhyasth Darshan) is the foremost task.  The teachers who will work on universalizing this will be proficient in behaviour, reasoning, wisdom and science.  Proficiency means having understood, as conception of knowledge.  After having understood, every human being becomes an evidence of knowledge with his own disposition, his own endeavour, and his own need.  Every human being has innate need of living with authenticity.  When you will feel that authenticity (evidencing knowledge) is absolutely necessary, then how will you remain quiet?  You will then become the evidence of knowledge as well.  I have accomplished this understanding by way of exploration, but those who will accomplish it from me will do so by way of education.  After study is completed, one takes responsibility with understanding.  After understanding, evidencing that understanding naturally entails.  When we become inclined for evidencing some aspect of understanding and go about telling it to the world, it is then we achieve its realization.  It is only then we become able to impart that understanding to others.  In this way, every human being will impart understanding only after having achieved realization.  Mere repetition of words won’t impart understanding.  There are exceptions though.  Some person who is very proficient in speaking, but hasn’t achieved realization, could convey the message to others.  That is what has happened thus far in human history.  After listening to some words, we accept and start our journeys of exploration.  This was the way I started my exploration as well.  However in my view - most people will study, achieve realization, and will produce evidence of their realization."

- Excerpt from English Translation of "Jeevan Vidya - Ek Parichaya" by Shree A. Nagraj.

The Path for Orderliness

"It is not that I mistrust the practices of prayers, chanting and meditation – but there is a limit to which these are effective.  The next stage of these practices is becoming desirous of salvation, which culminates in Samadhi, where there is nothing to be gained or lost.  In this way, I concluded that Orderliness doesn’t arise from the paths of devotion and renunciation."


- Excerpt from English Translation of "Jeevan Vidya - Ek Parichaya" by Shree A. Nagraj

Meaningful Living

"The Art of living with Humanness is about living with Resolution, Prosperity, Fearlessness and Coexistence.  I have lived thus, such living is meaningful, and you can live this way as well.  I have reached the conclusion that every human being has the need to evidence this understanding in his living.  Meaningful living is acceptable to everyone.  Everyone wants to live meaningfully.  Conduct of Humanness is meaningful for human race."


- Excerpt from English Translation of "Jeevan Vidya - Ek Parichaya" by Shree A. Nagraj.

Possibility in Human being

"Every human being has such a big treasure of humanness innate to himself in the form of possibility.  Every human being evidences it based on his desire, need and joyousness.  This innateness is common to every human being.  If only one person could be orderly with understanding and others were to continue living mechanically, then this desire and need of happiness would not have been there in all human beings."

- Excerpt from English Translation of "Jeevan Vidya - Ek Parichaya" by Shree A. Nagraj

आधार

स्वयं का मूल्यांकन

मानव को अपने विकास की दृष्टि से स्वयं का मूल्यांकन करना प्राथमिक एवं महत्त्वपूर्ण कार्यक्रम है।  स्वयं का मूल्यांकन यदि सही नहीं है तो उस स्थिति में अध्ययन के लिए आवश्यक सामर्थ्य को संजो लेना संभव नहीं है।  - मानव व्यव्हार दर्शन, श्री ए. नागराज।

अध्ययन की बात

संवाद

कल्पनाशीलता

सर्व मानव में कल्पनाशीलता है.  भ्रमित अवस्था में कल्पनाशीलता आशा, विचार और इच्छा की “अस्पष्ट गति” है.  भ्रमित अवस्था में भी हम जो देखते हैं, वह कल्पनाशीलता के द्वारा ही देखते हैं.  कल्पनाशीलता न हो तो यह सब कुछ नहीं दिखेगा.  भ्रमित अवस्था में हम अपने कर्म-फल के प्रति आश्वस्त नहीं रहते हैं.  हम कुछ सोच के करते हैं, उससे होता और ही कुछ है. 

अध्ययन पूर्वक जागृति के लिए क्रमिक रूप से सच्चाइयों का साक्षात्कार हो कर बोध होता है.  यह आशा, विचार और इच्छा की “स्पष्ट गति” है.  स्पष्ट गति का अर्थ है – कर्म करने में स्वतन्त्र और फल भोगने में भी स्वतन्त्र.  साक्षात्कार-बोध का यह क्रम सह-अस्तित्व में पूर्ण होता है.  सह-अस्तित्व में साक्षात्कार-बोध पूर्ण होने का अर्थ है – मानव चारों अवस्थाओं के साथ अपने आचरण को क्रिया पूर्णता और आचरण पूर्णता के रूप में निश्चित कर पाता है.  साक्षात्कार-बोध पूर्ण होने के फलस्वरूप आत्मा में अनुभव होता है. 

आँखें मूँद लेना या मौन होना अध्ययन विधि नहीं है.  अध्ययन जागृत मानव के साथ सार्थक संवाद पूर्वक है. 

प्रश्न: कल्पनाशीलता के प्रयोग से मुझे क्या और कहाँ देखना है?

उत्तर: आपकी कल्पनाशीलता आप के साथ ही रहता है.  कल्पनाशीलता के क्रियाकलाप को ही देखना है.  कल्पनाशीलता ही दिखता है, और कुछ दिखता ही नहीं है.  अनुभव की रोशनी में अध्ययन करने वाले को उसकी कल्पनाशीलता का क्रियाकलाप दिखता है.  अनुभव की रोशनी अध्ययन कराने वाले के पास रहता है.  जिज्ञासा अध्ययन करने वाले के पास रहता है.  इसके आधार पर अध्ययन का क्रियान्वयन होता है.  जिज्ञासा में कमी हो या अनुभव में कमी हो तो अध्ययन नहीं होगा.  अध्ययन करने वाला प्रभावित होता है, अध्ययन कराने वाला प्रभावित करता है. 

अध्ययन करने वाले के अधिष्ठान (आत्मा) के साक्षी में अध्ययन होता है.  अध्ययन कराने वाले पर अध्ययन करने वाला विश्वास करता है.  अधिकार अध्ययन कराने वाले के पास रहता है.  अध्ययन पूर्ण होने पर अध्ययन करने वाले और अध्ययन कराने वाले में समानता हो जाता है. 

प्रश्न: साक्षात्कार की वस्तु क्या है?

उत्तर: साक्षात्कार की वस्तु है – सह-अस्तित्व, सह-अस्तित्व में विकास-क्रम, सह-अस्तित्व में विकास, सह-अस्तित्व में जागृति-क्रम और सह-अस्तित्व में जागृति.  इतना साक्षात्कार हो कर बोध होने के फलस्वरूप अनुभव होता है.  रूप, गुण, स्वभाव, धर्म का साक्षात्कार होता है.  स्वभाव-धर्म का बुद्धि में बोध होता है.  अनुभव में केवल धर्म जाता है.  इस विधि से सूत्रित होता है. 

प्रश्न:  क्या मूल्यों का साक्षात्कार और बोध होता है?

उत्तर: मूल्य गुणों में गण्य हैं.  जागृति-क्रम और जागृति के साक्षात्कार में मूल्यों की समझ बीज रूप में रहती है.  अनुभव में सब कुछ बीज रूप में ही रहता है.  अभिव्यक्ति, सम्प्रेष्णा और प्रकाशन क्रम में वह विस्तृत होता जाता है.  संक्षिप्त हो कर अनुभव होता है.  विस्तृत हो कर प्रमाण होता है.  अनुभव के बाद मानव की कल्पनाशीलता अनुभव मूलक हो जाता है.  अनुभव की रोशनी में हर बात को स्पष्ट करने का अधिकार बन जाता है.  बीज रूप में “होना” समझ में आ जाता है.  “रहना” उस समझ की व्याख्या है.

प्रश्न: क्या मूल्य मानव-जीवन में “स्वभाव” नहीं हैं?

उत्तर: - स्वभाव अनुभव और मूल्यों का संयुक्त रूप है.  स्वभाव के एक ओर अनुभव का सार है, दूसरी तरफ प्रकाशित होने के लिए मूल्य हैं.  अध्ययन क्रम में मूल्यों को लेकर सूचना स्वीकार हो जाता है, और वही संक्षिप्त हो कर अनुभव में बीज रूप में अवस्थित होता है.

प्रश्न: साक्षात्कार क्रमिक रूप से होता है, क्या बोध भी क्रमिक रूप से होता है?

उत्तर: हाँ.  साक्षात्कार हो कर बुद्धि में बोध जमा होता जाता है.

प्रश्न: अध्ययन क्रम में रहते हुए स्वयं की गणना जीव-चेतना में की जाए या मानव-चेतना में की जाए?

उत्तर: अध्ययन क्रम में जीव-चेतना से छूटने की स्वीकृति और मानव चेतना को अपनाने की स्वीकृति हो जाती है.  यह उस बीच की स्थिति है. 

प्रश्न: क्रमिक रूप में साक्षात्कार होते हुए, मुझे किन पक्षों का साक्षात्कार हो चुका है, और किनका नहीं हुआ है – इसकी पहचान कैसे की जाए?

उत्तर: अनुभव से पहले उसका कुछ पता नहीं चलता.  अनुभव के बाद प्रमाणित कर पाए या नहीं कर पाए – उससे पता चलता है.  प्रमाणित कर पाए तो अनुभव किये हैं, प्रमाणित नहीं कर पाए तो अनुभव नहीं किये हैं.  इसमें कोई छिपाव दुराव नहीं है.  चारों अवस्थाओं के साथ प्रमाणित होने के लिए अनुभव आवश्यक है.  अनुभव स्थिति में सूत्र है, जीने में व्याख्या है. 

साक्षात्कार कल्पनाशीलता में गुणात्मक विकास है. कल्पनाशीलता का साधन हर व्यक्ति के पास है, जिसका उपयोग करने की आवश्यकता है.

 

-          श्री ए. नागराज के साथ राकेश-प्रियंका, अशोक-शीला, प्रवीण-आतिशी और श्रीराम-गौरी के संवाद पर आधारित (सितम्बर २००९, अमरकंटक)