Question: - Darwin postulated evolution principle (of Natural Selection) which has a widespread acceptance even today. What is the distinction between your postulation of evolution from that of Darwin?
Answer: - Darwin’s postulation talks of evolution based on structural composition of body. For example: - body composition of an insect, a leech, a horse, a cow – and in the same way human body composition. The body compositions were studied based on the skeletal structures. Evolution was explained in terms of how the bones became longer or shorter, wider or narrower in bodies of animals. Here human body was considered as reference and all other body compositions were chronologically linked behind it as course of evolution. Darwin’s postulation about body composition has some difficulty, but his presentation about human being is completely wrong. According to Darwin, monkeys successively transformed into humans and many intermediate life forms happened in this course of evolution, which eventually perished. While according to me, the evolution of human body happened as a result of exploration in the pranic cells in the womb of some or the other enriched brain animal with the purpose of establishing the tradition of a body composition through which jeevan could evidence its awakening. According to Darwin, the circumstances of environment and habitat forced these events of uncertain body compositions. Darwin did not have the understanding of jeevan (conscious unit). He has not given any postulations from the reference of jeevan. Human being is a combined form of jeevan and body. Thus far evolution has been searched in body, in skeletons, and there are Nobel prizes, degrees and jobs based on these. The reference of those evolution theories is human body. If these theories are correct then humanness should have got realized along with human body's evolution , but that has not happened. Human being cannot be explained in terms of body alone, in terms of skeletal frame. As its evidence, Darwin himself has written that – I myself don’t get described in the framework of my bone structure. Darwin was incapable of giving definition of human being. He called evolution to be improvement in composition, while in reality the reference of evolutionary progress is jeevan. Body cannot function in the absence of jeevan. The one which keeps the body alive is jeevan itself. Human being is neither just on the basis of jeevan nor just on the basis of body. Human being is on the basis of both jeevan and body.
The evolution in atom is in terms of constitutional completeness. Every atom has a constitution with more than one particle. Every atom has to have a nucleus and orbiting particles. Such atoms are naturally there in existence, having two or more particles constituting them. There are many kinds of atoms, and among these is jeevan atom. There is no increase or decrease in the number of particles constituting a jeevan atom, therefore it is with inexhaustible force and strength. This itself is evolution in atom. Jeevan atom is being called as ‘evolved’, and awakening happens after this evolution. The evidence of awakening is – knowing, believing, recognizing and fulfilling. An atomic particle recognizes other atomic particle, and that is how these become orderly together by being in definite distance from each other – which becomes evident in the form of physical and chemical activities of nature. The most evolved composition of chemical activities is evident in the form of human body.
- An excerpt from English translation of "Jeevan Vidya - Ek Parichaya" by Shree A. Nagraj.